A little background on me, from December 1998 to September 7, 2001, I worked at One Park Avenue in NY. My wife worked for a company that took care of plants in office buildings all over metro NYC, including the Twin Towers. My last day of work was the Friday before 9/11 - I was in Albany when the planes hit the towers.
But in January 2002, just a few months after 9/11, I began my journey with the volunteer fire service. Like the average citizen, I had no idea how fire protection or ambulance service worked. I knew if I called 911 trucks with lights and sirens showed up. I knew to fill the boot during the fund drive. I knew my local fire company put on the best pancake breakfast around! I knew my best friend's mom kept a green light in her car (she was a volunteer EMT) but I was't allowed to play around with it! I never learned how departments received their income, how they knew to respond, how they trained and prepared - was all foreign to me. Then I started learning about the volunteer fire service and the dedicated community servants that staff the departments. I learned about the differences between a fire company and a fire district, and why a village fire department is different from an independent company. I've enjoyed every minute of it, and look forward to serving fire departments and local governments into the future. During these 17+ years, the volunteer fire service has changed. The events on 9/11 were a catalyst to some of those changes, but so many other factors are at play as well. This post isn't about what those factors are - I can't pretend to know what they all are to write an informative article on it (although I'd love to hear how you think things have changed). That being said, I've heard a lot of feedback from firefighters and commissioners, and been asked a lot of questions about how certain new activities fit into the point system. The types of emergencies have changed, the way departments respond has changed, training has changed, the time commitment has changed...you know what hasn't changed much at all? LOSAP. There has been some incremental changes over the years, but not enough to adapt to the way the volunteer fire service has evolved. In particular here in NY State, the point system needs an overhaul. The benefit available to defined contribution plans must be increased to be more competitive with the defined benefit plan. A statute that is vague and incomplete in many areas should be tightened up. I'm a believer in not complaining unless you have a solution. In this case, I don't have a great solution. I think it will take the combined efforts of the state-wide associations to spearhead a change, and I know they have other challenges in front of them. Until we can see some significant changes in the statute, we'll continue to deal with a once-size-fits-all statue when fire departments and their operations become increasingly unique.
0 Comments
Katie Casey was baseball mad,
Had the fever and had it bad. Just to root for the home town crew, Ev'ry sou Katie blew. On a Saturday her young beau Called to see if she'd like to go To see a show, but Miss Kate said "No, I'll tell you what you can do:" Take me out to the ball game, Take me out to the crowd; Buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jack, I don't care if I ever get back. Let me root, root, root for the home team, If they don't win, it's a shame. For it's one, two, three strikes, you're out, At the old ball game. Katie Casey saw all the games, Knew the players by their first names. Told the umpire he was wrong, All along, Good and strong. When the score was just two to two, Katie Casey knew what to do, Just to cheer up the boys she knew, She made the gang sing this song: Take me out to the ball game, Take me out to the crowd; Buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jack, I don't care if I ever get back. Let me root, root, root for the home team, If they don't win, it's a shame. For it's one, two, three strikes, you're out, At the old ball game. We've been asked several times over the last two-three weeks about the eligibility to participate in LOSAP. In particular, if "administrative only" members are eligible to participate. So we thought we would address it now. As usual, we cannot give legal advice - this is meant to help guide you and your attorney in making the best determination for your department. § 215 of the NYS General Municipal Law defines an active volunteer firefighter as: 1.“Active volunteer firefighter” means a person who has been approved by the authorities in control of a duly organized volunteer fire company or volunteer fire department as an active volunteer firefighter of such fire company or department and who is faithfully and actually performing service in the protection of life and property from fire or other emergency, accident or calamity in connection with which the services of such fire company or fire department are required. § 217, General Requirements, then states: (a)An active volunteer firefighter must be eligible to participate in any service award program provided under this article if the active volunteer firefighter has reached the age of eighteen and has completed at least one year of firefighting service. The sponsor of the service award program may impose younger age or shorter length of service requirements for participation in the service award program. The section of the Internal Revenue Code that governs LOSAPs states that a plan can be established for bona fide volunteers who perform qualified services. Those qualified services are defined to be "fire fighting and prevention services, emergency medical services, and ambulance services."
These definitions are slightly different, but seem to still get to the same general conclusion - the individual has to actually be a firefighter or ride the ambulance. That would seem to then clearly exclude social-only members (whatever your department calls them). In New York, generally fire departments classify their active members by medical clearance - some examples are internal, external, driver, administrative, Class A, Class B, or Class C. When it comes to determining who is eligible for LOSAP, the duties of each particular medical classification should be taken into consideration. There are two legal opinions from the Office of the State Comptroller about this issue. The first is Opinion 94-33. In this opinion, the State opined that "Retired" members of a fire department may not participate in a service award program unless they are subject to being called to duty under the department's rules and regulations. You can view that opinion here: https://www.osc.state.ny.us/legal/1994/legalop/op94-33.htm Opinion 97-24 states: The members of the "auxiliary" of an incorporated volunteer fire company located in a fire district may not participate in a service award program established for the members of the fire company unless they have been approved as members of the fire company and are subject to call for whatever duties may be assigned under the rules and regulations of the department or company. You can view this opinion here: https://www.osc.state.ny.us/legal/1997/legalop/op97-24.htm With these two opinions in view, as well as the related section of the Internal Revenue Code, it would appear that the main distinguishing feature of an active volunteer firefighter is if that individual is subject to being called to duty when the alarm rings. For the specific example that we were asked, the administrative-only member was not allowed to ride the fire truck or respond to the scene. They are allowed to respond to the firehouse, but they must remain at the station. When the trucks return they can clean them, inspect equipment, replace batteries, replace other supplies that were used (especially for ambulance services). In some cases the administrative-only members may operate the radio for communication. If an argument can be made that the tasks performed by administrative-only members can be considered "fire fighting and prevention services" as defined in the Code, and that they are "faithfully and actually performing service in the protection of life and property" as defined in the State Law, and that these individuals are "subject to call for whatever duties may be assigned under the rules and regulations of the department or company" as provided in the Comptroller Opinions, it would seem reasonable that administrative-only members would be eligible to earn LOSAP points. That said, there is another question that should be answered, which is if it is within the "spirit" of the law that these types of members are earning LOSAP points. Each fire department and municipality should also consider this question, and we'll address it in a future post. Again, we suggest reviewing this with your attorney. Were you aware that awarding points for periods of line-of-duty disability is actually optional?
It is true, but not well known! This section of the statute is actually one of the point system categories. Since it is a point system category, it is technically optional - a sponsor does not have to include every category. Now, I don't recall a sponsor purposefully excluding this provision, but it could be done. A sponsor should be aware though that it is optional, and that this category was added to the statute in 1993. Therefore, if your LOSAP was adopted prior to 1993 and you have never re-stated your point system, you may not have this category in your adopted point system. Check your point system and make sure it is included. If it isn't, check with your attorney about how to amend your point system. So for today I'm going to go a little off topic.
Those that know me, know I'm a very big Mets fan. I'm tempted to say there is no bigger fan than me, but there is always someone bigger. But I'm a former season ticket holder, watch/listen/follow every game, and you can guarantee the only place I don't wear some kind of Mets gear is church (although I'll occasionally wear a Mets tie). So reading this morning the comments from Noah Syndergaard really got me thinking, and I wanted to share my thoughts. First, his statement, "I don’t think that is what championship teams do prior to the season." What are we to do with this comment? So should I as a fan just give up on the team now, because they are rendered a non-championship team by virtue of going to Syracuse? Or, if the Mets do win a championship in 2019, does this mean that going to Syracuse is now what championship teams actually do? This comment just seems silly and ill-conceived. “You think we would go to New York to get, like adults, our things, our affairs in order, but no, we have got to go to Syracuse first. I don’t know whose idea that was, but it’s not a smart one. I don’t think that’s conducive for winning ballgames, that much travel." Revenue to spend on players certainly helps winning ballgames. Energizing a new fan base in Syracuse for a team owned by the Mets certainly would help grow revenue. Turning more New Yorkers into Mets fans, who purchase tickets, gear and other merchandise, would certainly help drive up revenue. All of which could be spent on Syndegaard's BFF Jake DeGrom.... “I am sure the amenities in Syracuse aren’t the best for major league baseball teams to go up there and have one last workout before the regular season starts, but that is above my paygrade.” So a workout in the Carrier Dome not good enough for a major leaguer? Major leaguers seem to be OK playing rehab games in Brooklyn or Binghamton - can a workout in Syracuse be that bad? I'm left with a shaking-my-head moment regarding how our new social-media world airs out problems. This type of disparaging discourse is not healthy or productive. I'm from the school that believes if you have a problem with someone, go to that person and address it. Don't talk to someone else about it, or in this case, air it out in the media. But that is the culture today, not just with public figures. It is so easy to go on your favorite social media platform to complain about something rather than addressing it and trying to either understand why a decision was made, or trying to be part of the solution. I'm not perfect of course, and neither is Syndergaard. I've complained to someone else about another person rather than addressing it directly. So I'm not going to take my Syndergaard pennant down from the man-cave wall just yet. But this is the type of attitude that needs to be addressed. It is ok to disagree and question authority, but when done correctly and with a spirit of cooperation or respect. There was nothing respectful about these comments. Emotional intelligence is one of the new buzzword phrases today. As more and more processes become automated, we need people who can interact with others civilly and empathetically. We need more positive and constructive discourse, not negative and destructive. If this is something you've had to deal with at your municipality, fire department, or workplace, I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. |
Archives
April 2022
Categories
All
|